WEST
LOTHIAN LICENCE COMMETTIE AND THEY JUDGE OR SHOULD WE SAYS THEY COURT
The
licence committee suspend a colour taxi driver for unlimited portion
for not attending a meeting with cab office due been in hospital 2
days earlier and in the same day they have set a white taxi driver
who processing drugs free very faire ???
MORE
TO COME
AT
THE APPEAL THE JUDGE MAKE HIS OWN STORY'S AND AT THE FINAL HEARING
REFUSE THE REFERENCE BY THE DRIVER WHILE HAPPILY ACCEPTTING THE
RESEFENCE BY WEST LOTHIAN COUNCIL SOLICITOR AND WITH THANK YOU VERY
MUCH IT'S GREAT HELP THAT WHAT THE JUDGE SAYS
TOTALLY ILLEGAL
BUT WHO GIVE A DAM
the
complaint letter to both the crown office and the Scottish government
first minster
Dear
Sir/Madam
I
am writing today complaining about a judge who is unfortunately a
judge.
the
judges reason for dismissing my appeal is unbelievable and has
ignored all the facts and all normal judgement any where in the world
, and if there is only 0.0001% fairness then such a judge should not
be allowed to work as a judge any where in the world, ignoring the
truth and misleading the fact
the
judge who stated to dismiss my appeal stated on page 4 under evidence
that I did say that i didn't act on the letter because I have
surrendered my private hire car licence on the DATE and I did not
respond to the letter which is NOT TRUE what I have said clearly
stated when I received the letter it was clearly stating the private
hire licence and there was no information in the letter regarding any
complaint against my self what so ever also it clearly stated that I
didn't ignore the letter only waited until I surrendered my private
hire car licence and shortly after I did so, i received another
letter dated 25 which I did act on it immediately and did contact the
cab office as there was no reasons in the letter for the asked
meeting and bi was confirmed by the cab office member over the phone
that it is to do with the renewal of my private hire car licence and
I did confirmed that I have already surrendered my private hire car
licence on ( DATE )and the lady confirmed to me it is to do with the
renewal of my private hire car licence and that there is no need to
attend the appointment with cab office and she will cancel it and if
there is any thing else she will contact me and took my details,
thereafter I received another letter to make an appointment also the
letter has no reasons for the requested meeting and I did contact the
cab office again and explained to them what happen before then they
transferred my call to inspector FFF... and arranged an appointment
for the ( DATE ),
the
judge wrote saying that I have attended the hospital for
investigation which I have clearly explained that I have been
transferred to the hospital by the ambulance under the suspicion of a
stroke 2 days earlier before the meeting .
Unbelievable
lies and disgrace and shame to any judge in the world .
Regarding
the councils witness, and the opportunity to speak which was total
lies and had been confirmed by the councils witness that I have never
been giving any chance to speak during the meeting or make any
comment and it was all questions and answers only I did try to speak
in too many occasions and been revoked by the chairman,also it was
confirmed in front of the judge that what Mr JJJJMMM the council
witness confirmed in front of the judge also he confirmed that his
written letter was only some notes and not all the information, when
I did question Mr JJJJJJ he admitted that he did not write every
thing he was only writing some notes and also he may have misplaced a
few notes as he did write in his notes that I said I didn't drive a
taxi since march which I never said and in other note that I was
driving a taxi 2 weeks before the committee meeting on ( DATE
) he was unable to give any explanation in front of the judge
and admitted that he may have made a few mistakes when writing the
notes, he also confirmed in front of the judge that I haven't been
giving any chance to speak and it was only questions and answers and
I have never been giving the chance to speak in mitigation of any
penalty as the judge claimed , totally lies from a judge who listened
to the witness confirming that I haven't been giving any chance to
speak and the statement for my circumstance was the only question
from the committee member and after the chairman said we do have a
case then just to make it look legal one of the members had asked me
if I have a mortgage or kids and it is also written and confirmed by
the Mr JJJ.... in both his written statement and while giving
evidence at court in front of the judge who changed this fact and
twisted it
THE
JUDGE FINDINGS IN FACT
Said
that the letters sent by the cab office was a true copy NO IT IS NOT
A TRUE COPY AND HE KNOW THAT IT IS NOT TRUE COPYAS HE ALREADY LOOKED
AT THE ORIGINAL I HAVE RECEIVED WHICH HAS NO ANY HAND WRITTENG OR
REASON FOR THE MEETING ONLY STATED PRIVATE HIRE LICENCE AFTER ALL THE
JUDGE REFUSE TO TAKE MY LETTER OR CONSIDER IT CLAIMING IT
IS THE HEARING DAY NO FURTHER EVIDNCE SHOULD BE ACCEPTED SURE FROM ME
BUT ANY THING FROM WEST LOTHIAN COUNCIL IS ACCEPTED
THIS
IS HOW FAIR WAS MY COURT TRAIL
i
received 3 letter and I did act on them and never ignored them,
and
the letter supplied to the court dated ( DATE ) from
inspector ????? and I did state to the judge at the court it is
not a true a copy from the original letter received as it has a hand
written comment on it which it was not in the original letter I
received which is a very clear evidence that they have already
fraudulent the letter by adding hand written comments back dated to
the original date of the letter,
I
showed the judge the true copy of this letter but he ignored and
refused to take it from me and only accepted there letter which was
illegal and fraud as they added more sentences to it.
TOTALLY
PROTACTION TO BOTH THE COUNCIL AND THE CAB OFFICE
the
document by the council witness IS NOT TRUE AND NOT
ACCURATE COPY OF THE MEETING by the witness confirmation in front of
the judge
Unbelievable
it
has been clearly confirmed in front of the judge that the notes are
not accurate by the witness and clearly state he missed a few
points and not every thing on it it was some notes ,i can't
believe what I am reading here by the judge, the witness has
clearly confirmed in front of the judge that this notes is not all
what happen in the meeting and also he was unable to give any
explanation regarding his misleading note about having been driving a
taxi since march and then I was driving a taxi 2 weeks before the
committee meeting on ( DATE ) when this is wrong, he
clearly state in front of the judge that he may miss a few points
during the meeting or maybe he miss understood a few points so how
come it is accurate and correct I don't know ?
submission
as the judges understanding
the
judge decided to follow the councils solicitor and the committee
meeting on ( DATE ) was only to consider the complaint
against me for not attending the meeting with cab office,the judge
chose to ignore the truth fact regarding the Scotland act 1982 and
accepted whatever he likes from this act and ignored the rest ,he
only chose to accepted the councils rights to suspend my licence and
refused to accept there duty which they are supposed to follow before
exercising there power to suspend my life, the act clearly stated
that all relevant information should be discussed and taken into
consideration if the licence committee decided to exercise there
power to suspend my licence .
On
page 8 the judge stated regarding my explanation for not attending
the meeting with cab office which I believe he meant that I have
clearly stated in front of the committee that I have contacted the
cab office when I was told it is to do with the renewal of the
private hire car licence,
the
judge stated he can't accept the argument as the licence committee is
not a court of law and the fact that the licence committee did not
consider my explanation does not not lead to explanation has to be
accepted even when when he have enough evidence that I have stated
that in front of cab office member and they never deny it or comment
as if they already knew that also confirmed in front of the judge by
the council witness James Miller even so the judge claimed that I
have full opportunity to put it before them how is that and when and
where ??
he
can't accept this so he is accepting only any point against me and
whatever the licence committee does or says it doesn't matter, the
judge claimed that the licence committee is not a court of law even
when they should act in a similar way if that is the case then they
shouldn't have the right to suspend my licence and what is the point
for me to attend the licence committee meeting if they are not
following the act of law regarding the Scotland 1982 licence act.
Again
any thing and every thing illegal the judge accepted it as legal and
reasonable ,the licence committee sent the police to my house within
2 days from they decision to take my taxi licence ,which is illegal
and they don't have the right to do so, it is totally clear regarding
this matter which I have the right to send the licence back within 7
days from they decision ,even so he found it reasonable as he claims
it is a reasonable arrangement, how can an illegal arrangement be
called a reasonable arrangement. For sure it is not even the police
officer who came to my house to collect the licence couldn't believe
that was the reason and I have clearly stated in front of the judge
who change all my statements and twisted all the facts and made his
own law regarding this matter it is clearly shown the anger manner
from the licence committee by the way they have dealt with my case.
at
the final hearing I have cleared all the matter carefully so there is
nothing that can be missed out the only matter that I never thought
about was the judge himself
and
that's what I have started with at final hearing
there
is only 1 question that needs to be an answered here and will explain
every thing
WHAT
IS THE CASE AGAINST MY SELF
IS
IT NOT ATTENDING THE CAB OFFICE MEETING
OR
THE LEGAL ISSUE REGARDING SAFETY AND LEGAL OPERATION OF PRIVATE HIRE
VEHICLE
IS
IT A MATTER OF SAFETY FOR WEST LOTHIAN CITEZEN AND COMUNINTY OR IT IS
ONLY AGAINST MY SELF BECAUSE OF THE CAB DRIVERS ASSOCIATION WHICH I
DID CREATE IN 2007 AND ATTENDED A COMMETTIEE METTING SAYING WHAT THE
LICENCE IS DOING BY RISTRICTING THE NUMBER OF THE TAXI PLATES IN WEST
LOTHIAN IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL AND IT IS VERY CLEAR THAT THE LICENCE
COMMITTEE EXERICES THEY POWER ILLEGALLY , I DID SAY ALL OF THAT IF
FRONT OF THE COMMITTEE A FEW TIMES
and
if the suspension is only because I haven't attended the cab office
meeting I have clearly stated in front of the committee that I have
already contacted the cab office and they confirmed to me it is to do
with the renewal of my private hire car and neither inspector FFFFF
from the cab office or any of the committee member made any comment
as if they already know about it and whatever I say will never change
there intention of suspending my taxi licence . This was also
confirmed by the witness while giving evidence at the
court,
Even
so the Judge totally ignored the main fact which is my clear
explanation regarding contacting the cab office and they confirmation
there is no need to attend a meeting .and claims they did not believe
me and he is OK with that
also
the judge said that west lothian solicitor helpfully
submitted a written submission and he ignored that he also
submitted and he accepted the reference along with his
written submission which the judge has used to make his decision
against myself by the 2 references he did use in page 8 regarding V
Dundee council and Merjury v Renfrewshire Council in 2000
the
solicitor came and simply threw this reference in front of me and
passed a copy to he judge who just said thank you that is very
helpful and never commented regarding the reference or any objection
against such a reference even with my objection he says yes will see
?? unbelievable !!!! it is OK for the council solicitor to submit any
thing what so ever whenever they like and I am not allowed to do so ,
I
had 2 references which I also did say on the hearing and the judge
refused to take them from me even so I explained both references on
the hearing
1-was
from a case been reviewed by the licence committee in the same day (
DATE ) regarding the driver who was been convicted processing
drugs and was only given one month suspension or until he attended a
medical check , is my case worse 14 times than any drug dealer or
processing, does missing an appointment deserve to get a licence
suspended ,does missing an appointment have a huge risk to the public
safety or it much for public safety ,what have I done to deserve
this, this is the only job I can do ,working as a taxi driver was the
only flexible job I can do, I was a victim to hit and run 5 years ago
which I was left with permanent damage to my spinal cord and nothing
doctors can do for me apart from 30 pain killer tablets every day to
manage my daily life .
is
that how is it works the judges take orders from the local council
and if so what is the point about making a complaint or appeal
The
same judge who refused to accept a previous letter I have found from
the cab office along with reference regarding a driver who been
charged by processing drugs and it is only been giving either a
suspension for 1 month or until he gets a medical report to say he
has no drugs on him
my
reference was refused and west lothian solicitors reference was
accepted by the judge and not just that the judge built his unfair
decision with this reference.
the
judge keep misleading the fact by saying I have been giving the full
opportunity to speak when it s already been confirmed by the councils
witness that I have been revoked ever time I did try to speak even by
they council witness and solicitor Mr JJJJ.... who clearly state that
all previous submission by council which stated that I have been
giving the chance to comment was totally lies and also by Mr JJJJ....
written notes and statement in front of the judge while giving
statement as a witness regarding giving the opportunity to explain my
circumstance was also a lie as it was only questions and answers he
also confirmed in front of the judge that I did try to speak 3 times
and every times I was revoked by the chairman and after all of that I
judge twisted all this statements and the written notice and claimed
that I have been giving the full opportunity to speak when I didn't
get a chance to,
and
the judge can't see any thing wrong with they decision and it is been
fair
what
kind of fairness is that when all the fact was ignored once by the
licence committee and secondly by the judge
the
decision
WOULD IT REALLY WORTH TO COMPLAINT TO THE CROWN
OFFICE ?
THE FACT IS NO, IT IS A CRICLE AND ALL PROTECTING EACH
OTHER WHATEVER IT COST
THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT AGREED TO PROTECT
RACIAL ABUSE AND EACH OTHER UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCE SO TO FIGHT THEM
YOU NEEDS MONEY AND ONLY MONEY CAN AND POWER CAN STOP THIS MAFIA
ALSO A COMPLAINT SENT TO THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT AND THE
REPLY WAS VERY SIMPLE THERE IS NOTHING WE CAN DO YOU CAN TAKE A
FURTHER ACTION BY THE LAW IF YOU WANT
if what we written here
in this website in any other country or even in England for sure
there will be different matter and we will see a totally different
reply from any respectable government body who can investigate such
an well organized Mafia crime
